Blogs – a corruption of web-log – that the readers have to have ‘blog’ defined for them is hilarious. Don’t be misled. This is not a journalistic attempt at clarity–it is a classic, upper middle class English attempt at a back hand slam. It’s an example of English snobbery. See, when you’re really upper class you don’t even know what such common and vulgar things are. Thus English UCTs (upper class twits) show their snobbery. Example: You mention Oprah Winfrey in conversation and they put on a fake confused look and a John Gielgud accent and say, “What is an Oprah? Is that the same thing as an ‘opera’?”were invented in America,the snobbery continues with one of the English literati’s stock items: anti-Americanism. Don’t you know if it comes from America it comes from the land of nose picking hillbillies who marry their sisters, believe in creationism, tote guns in their pick up trucks and slurp Mountain Dew non stop? “It’s from America my dear! How simply ghastly!” where they still thrive, “Goodness me! this funny American thingy called a ‘blog’ still thrives? You mean it hasn’t died out yet? What, those people in America cling to their blogs like they cling to their religion and their guns? How awfully, awfully backward of them!” Isn’t it more likely that it is the print media’s survival that should surprise us? What? a little weekly magazines with editors and reporters and subscribers? How quaint! You mean the English still do such things? And it still thrives? Not for long. particularly among the political and religious right wing. and there are no left wing blogs? Doesn’t anyone ask why right wing talk radio and right wing blogs are a success? It’s market forces. People are not getting what they want from the mainstream media, so they look elsewhere. Happily publishing and broadcasting is now totally open. Let the market decide who survives. What feeds the blogosphere’s paranoia is a sense of resentment that “they” – those in charge – are engaged in a conspiracy against “us” ordinary folk. Uh. This is a two way street. This article sounds a little bit paranoid to me. Doesn’t such a tirade suggest that the writer at the Tablet feels threatened? All those invisible underground bloggers are all against ‘us’ main stream media types. They must be stopped! The main media is regarded as part of that conspiracy, which is why the internet – cheap, unregulated and with unlimited capacity – has drawn the bloggers to itself. In Britain, too, there are Catholic bloggers, again often right-wing, polemical and vituperative. What!? You mean there are some British people who actually have lowered themselves to write those awful American ‘weblog’ thingies? How too too horrid? It really is ghastly! Not only British, but even a few English? Dear me, what next? The targets in this case often seem to include The Tablet, in some sort of fantastical conspiracy with the bishops. Generally, blogs are far from an idealised forum for an exchange of intelligent ideas that would be constructive. I love this. Blogs are immediate, allow for readers to comment and exchange opinions with one another at length. This compared to the typical newspaper’s letters column–in which editors pick and choose the letters they publish, edit them down and have to limit in time and space all the comments that are made? Anybody can publish a blog and have instant global publishing. This is called freedom of speech. This is somehow inferior to a magazine whose editor is appointed by a rarified, self appointed board of directors in order to consciously promote a particular agenda? Notice too the assumptions in this pompous statement. The blogs are all, by implication stupid and destructive and it is the main media (like the Tablet) who are obviously ‘intelligent’ and ‘constructive’.More often they indulge in straight poison-pen character assassination without reference to any requirements of accuracy or balance. This is simply an untrue slander. To be sure there are some bloggers out there who are pretty nasty, but the vast number of conservative Catholic bloggers are intelligent, charitable, funny and not a few are genuinely scholarly, devout and humble.
The Bitter Pill
As UK readers, and American readers of UK blogs will know, The Tablet is a Catholic liberal weekly. It is fondly referred to by those who dislike it’s dissenting tone as The Bitter Pill. In short, it is the Catholic journal conservatives love to hate.
Recently the Bitter Pill picked on Fr. Tim Finegan the Hermeneutic of Continuity blogger. In a longer editorial The Tablet have vented their fury on blogging and conservative Catholic bloggers in particular.
Here is my Fr.Z type fisk of the paragraph in question:
What are you thoughts on Catholic blogging v. mainstream Catholic media?
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
13 Comments
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All that Catholic manestream media bisniss…they’re haraticks I tell ya, HARATICKS! Burn em, BURN EM ALL!!!
The Catholic bit aside, this is just another Leftist organ raging impotently against the millions of bloggers who have empowered themselves and their readers to step off of the liberal media plantation.”WaaaAAAHHhh, I want my monopoly back!”
The Tablet is like a road hog-: driving in the middle of the road so no-one can overtake, except now other road users have found the orbital and don’t have to sit behind it anymore!
Fr. Dwight, Let’s have a little bit of balance, please.Since when have the Brits ever accused the Yanks of marrying their sisters?
Francis, I saw it in an editorial in The Guardian when I lived in England. Admittedly it was an exaggeration, but one which was in keeping with the journo’s generally bigoted tone.
Catholic bloggers go all over the political spectrum, some are unfailingly polite even to their ideological opposites. Some have all the restraint of rabid junkyard dogs. All operate on an equal footing. No matter how insignificant the blog, it’s likely to sooner or later be contacted by opponents. This forces the blogger to either prove their case in a precise, cogent manner or do the equivalent of sticking their fingers in their ears and shouting LA-LA-LA over and over.Regardless, the blogger recognizes the existence of an intellectually equal opposition in the blogosphere.Catholic media (in my very limited experience) either maintain strict neutrality on all things political or come down foursquare for the liberals. They’re left with a delusion that they’re absolutely right because few opposing them has the funds, time or training to effectively voice their opinions. The option is to disconnect from the media, leaving only inhabitants of an ideological echo chamber. So dissent is treated with contempt, silencing any chance of intelligent discussion and further reinforcing the echo chamber existence. The media that is actively engaged in political posturing will become increasingly isolated from political reality. Catholic bloggers are forced to learn there is a real world out there that doesn’t always agree with them or play nice.Catholic media are lotus eaters.Just my opinion.
Last Autumn before the election, I was constantly asked on my trips to the UK about Obama. When I said I could never vote for him because of his anti-abortion positions and his executive inexperience, people looked at me as if I was from Mars. “He so intelligent. he’s so charismatic, he so…..you know….wonderful!” They would ask how Americans could be so shortsighted as to not elect the most popular person on the planet. Then the subject of Sarah Palin came up……..We all indulge in stereotypes but there is a condescension towards Americans. Since I know British history and have studied it as an adult over the years, some people are amazed that a Shakespeare quote or the politics of the Civil War can be known by an American.I could go on for a while with many examples. The Uk is a relatively small country and it is hard for the average British person to understand the diversity of a people where the distance between Boston and San Diego is 300 miles greater than the distance between London and Cairo.Communities of bloggers both Catholic and conservative tend to break down these stereotypes. My favorite blogs are British and we see the world and all of its superficiality and evil through the same Catholic lens since the political systems are of the World and not Christ.
Father, your point with regards the Pill’s explanation of a blog being a classic example of British snobbery is questionable. I sincerely believe that the average Pill reader has never seen a blog. I have met the present editor and she didn’t strike me as computer literate herself. In fact, she didn’t seem to know what was going on at all in the modern World. Her “world” was the last famous person she had interviewed and that was it. If y
Love your new look blog Fr.Blogging rules!! lol
As Fr. Finigan pointed out on his Hermeneutic of Continuity blog, The Tablet has gone downhill since 1968 when it very publicly dissented from Pope Paul VI’s encyclical Humanae Vitae. I recall that time very well and lost all respect for the publication from then onwards.What struck me about this editorial, apart from its ‘toffee-nosed’ attitude, was that The Tablet would be so public about its paranoia!You – and the other priestly and lay Catholic bloggers – have got them on the run, Father!Keep up the chase!
I could be being unduly cynical here, but do you think it is possible that they measured their interweb hit-rate thingy do-dah, (the special machine that adds up the number of people visiting the site, for our tablet-reading friends) during the hermeneutical spat a few weeks ago and thought…………”Hmmmmm I know – we’ll put up some provocative content, make it free, and wait for all the bloggers to hit it. Then we’ll have a really popular website to sell ads from….., and boast about generally”. I think we could b being taken for mugs here (still – a great fisk).
How typical of the left. Attack the right for being uncultured bigoted brutes while they resort to misinformed intolerant name calling.
“Since when have the Brits ever accused the Yanks of marrying their sisters?”Mark Steyn in “America Alone” (do read this wonderful book if you haven’t already) quotes Brian Reade in the Daily Mirror description of Americans as “self-righteous, gun-totin’, military-lovin’, sister-marryin’, abortion-hatin’, gay-loathin’, foreigner-despisin’, non-passport-ownin’ rednecks”. Steyn translates this as “culturally confident, self-reliant, patriotic, procreative, religious, democratic, constitutional rednecks”. Sister-marrying is more often ascribed to the inhabitants of Norfolk.